<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Small to Middle Donors and Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asmallchange.net/small-to-middle-donors-and-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asmallchange.net/small-to-middle-donors-and-obama/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=small-to-middle-donors-and-obama</link>
	<description>Making Sense of Fundraising</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:58:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Wu</title>
		<link>http://www.asmallchange.net/small-to-middle-donors-and-obama/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Wu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 08:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmallchange.net/?p=1088#comment-867</guid>
		<description>These are some great thoughts that we&#039;ve been vouching for non-profits to adopt. Smaller asks are great, but it is also communicating a clear need and enabling supporters to make an impact .

Charity Water and the Barak Obama campaign are great examples of this concept. They used supporter-driven campaigns that empowered anyone to make a difference. In addition to using social media, they use technology platforms (fundraising pages, video, etc) to get the small donors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are some great thoughts that we&#8217;ve been vouching for non-profits to adopt. Smaller asks are great, but it is also communicating a clear need and enabling supporters to make an impact .</p>
<p>Charity Water and the Barak Obama campaign are great examples of this concept. They used supporter-driven campaigns that empowered anyone to make a difference. In addition to using social media, they use technology platforms (fundraising pages, video, etc) to get the small donors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara Grey</title>
		<link>http://www.asmallchange.net/small-to-middle-donors-and-obama/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara Grey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 22:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmallchange.net/?p=1088#comment-866</guid>
		<description>I like your idea about the opt-out box. I believe there is research that shows people will tend to give a little more than expected if the amount of their donation is completely voluntary, rather than a specific amount requested.

And &quot;small is the new big&quot; in fundraising. I may have to use that one. 

Great blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your idea about the opt-out box. I believe there is research that shows people will tend to give a little more than expected if the amount of their donation is completely voluntary, rather than a specific amount requested.</p>
<p>And &#8220;small is the new big&#8221; in fundraising. I may have to use that one. </p>
<p>Great blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Wesley</title>
		<link>http://www.asmallchange.net/small-to-middle-donors-and-obama/#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmallchange.net/?p=1088#comment-865</guid>
		<description>As many here probably know, one example of an NP that has adopted a thorough highly successful e-strategy platform is charity:water.  www.charitywater.com.  My sense is that studying their approach to new generations of donors and what makes that approach tick is time very well spent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many here probably know, one example of an NP that has adopted a thorough highly successful e-strategy platform is charity:water.  <a href="http://www.charitywater.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.charitywater.com</a>.  My sense is that studying their approach to new generations of donors and what makes that approach tick is time very well spent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

