Reactive or Proactive

by Jason Dick · 2 comments

There are numerous different strategies for raising money. Some organizations are long-term planners and set-up a development plan that they use as a road map throughout the year. Other organizations watch and wait for the right time to send out that perfect appeal. Following a plan and rapidly responding to changing community needs are both valuable and important fundraising skills. Often organizations fall on one side or the other of that line with a perspective that is either proactive or reactive when it comes to donor management.

Reactive and proactive donor management really are opposites. Reactive donor management provides you an opportunity to approach individual donors in a very focused and personal way. Often you can provide very custom thank you materials and have the flexibility to respond to urgent and last minute requests and opportunities. Proactive donor management involves the creation and adherence to a development plan. Those who excel at being proactive will plan out all of their campaigns for the year and the time line it will take to make those campaigns a success. Proactive management usually allows a development program to accomplish more in a given year, but it may not allow for as much last minute polishing of a project or solicitation plan.

It surprises me how little these two style of donor management are blended together. What kind of donor management style has your organization adopted? Any tips on how to be both proactive and reactive at your organization?

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Online Fundraising July 1, 2010 at 6:28 pm

I’ve always preferred getting the whole community involved. Approaching individuals for donations may be “personal” to some, but it’s just to cliche for me.

Reply

Dan Blakemore July 20, 2010 at 7:31 pm

I have been working in the last few months to get my organization specifically focused on being proactive in prospecting, cultivation, solicitation and especially stewardship as we prepare for the last year of a four-year challenge grant. I wonder if our strategy will become much more proactive when we no longer have the challenge to encourage our donors to make new or increased gifts.

I am very interested to hear how others may be using one approach or the other, though I really would love to hear how fundraisers are blending the approaches, especially in this economic climate.

Thanks for blogging on this topic!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: