<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grassroots- A broad brush stroke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asmallchange.net/grassroots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asmallchange.net/grassroots/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=grassroots</link>
	<description>Making Sense of Fundraising</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 01:12:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.asmallchange.net/grassroots/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmallchange.net/?p=8#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I completely agree.  I think that it is very misleading to say, &quot;your gift will support X&quot; and then later you have to explain how it went to general funds or greatest needs.  In that case I agree that it is much better to say, &quot;It costs X to do Y.&quot;  But I do know that there are charities out there that money goes directly to what the money asks for.  Such as a sponsor a child program, or purchasing a goat, etc.  And I would think that would make a huge difference.

I imagine that it makes a difference too describe what it cost to make real change happen.  It might be better to say your money is supporting this kind of work if it costs $100,000 to do something.  But if it costs $30 dollars it might make a bigger difference to say your gift supports an organization that is doing X and Y.

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree.  I think that it is very misleading to say, &#8220;your gift will support X&#8221; and then later you have to explain how it went to general funds or greatest needs.  In that case I agree that it is much better to say, &#8220;It costs X to do Y.&#8221;  But I do know that there are charities out there that money goes directly to what the money asks for.  Such as a sponsor a child program, or purchasing a goat, etc.  And I would think that would make a huge difference.</p>
<p>I imagine that it makes a difference too describe what it cost to make real change happen.  It might be better to say your money is supporting this kind of work if it costs $100,000 to do something.  But if it costs $30 dollars it might make a bigger difference to say your gift supports an organization that is doing X and Y.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leonot</title>
		<link>http://www.asmallchange.net/grassroots/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>leonot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 19:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmallchange.net/?p=8#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I actually have a slightly contrarian view on equivalences.  I do understand
their importance and effectiveness, but....

My concern tends to center around how they&#039;re presented.

&quot;Your gift of X will do Y.&quot;

No. No it won&#039;t. Any sufficiently sophisticated donor will know that&#039;s not how
it works at all. My gift of X will go into a big pot with a lot of other gifts.
Out of that pot will come many,many Y&#039;s, Z&#039;s and other things. If I don&#039;t make
my gift of X, Y will likely still happen.

I know I&#039;m spliting hairs here, and perhaps being a bit pedantic, but I think
that when asking folks for donations it&#039;s critical to choose words VERY
carefully so as to be accurate and never be placed in a position where you have
to say &quot;well, what we really meant was ...&quot;. It&#039;s a trust thing - if they can&#039;t
trust your message, what else can&#039;t they trust?

A list of:

&quot;It costs X to do Y&quot;
&quot;It costs X&#039; to do Y&#039;&quot;

and so on followed by a more general statement such as:

&quot;Your generous gift will help us to continue to do those, and much, much more.&quot;

Seems more honest.

Is it as effective? That&#039;s the part I don&#039;t know.

That&#039;s what makes this as much an art as a science - balance.

As a donor, I know it&#039;s one thing that I&#039;ve always kinda sorta noticed from
various organizations and occasionally reacted to negatively.

Leo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually have a slightly contrarian view on equivalences.  I do understand<br />
their importance and effectiveness, but&#8230;.</p>
<p>My concern tends to center around how they&#8217;re presented.</p>
<p>&#8220;Your gift of X will do Y.&#8221;</p>
<p>No. No it won&#8217;t. Any sufficiently sophisticated donor will know that&#8217;s not how<br />
it works at all. My gift of X will go into a big pot with a lot of other gifts.<br />
Out of that pot will come many,many Y&#8217;s, Z&#8217;s and other things. If I don&#8217;t make<br />
my gift of X, Y will likely still happen.</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m spliting hairs here, and perhaps being a bit pedantic, but I think<br />
that when asking folks for donations it&#8217;s critical to choose words VERY<br />
carefully so as to be accurate and never be placed in a position where you have<br />
to say &#8220;well, what we really meant was &#8230;&#8221;. It&#8217;s a trust thing &#8211; if they can&#8217;t<br />
trust your message, what else can&#8217;t they trust?</p>
<p>A list of:</p>
<p>&#8220;It costs X to do Y&#8221;<br />
&#8220;It costs X&#8217; to do Y&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>and so on followed by a more general statement such as:</p>
<p>&#8220;Your generous gift will help us to continue to do those, and much, much more.&#8221;</p>
<p>Seems more honest.</p>
<p>Is it as effective? That&#8217;s the part I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what makes this as much an art as a science &#8211; balance.</p>
<p>As a donor, I know it&#8217;s one thing that I&#8217;ve always kinda sorta noticed from<br />
various organizations and occasionally reacted to negatively.</p>
<p>Leo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leonot</title>
		<link>http://www.asmallchange.net/grassroots/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>leonot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmallchange.net/?p=8#comment-48</guid>
		<description>As will I. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As will I. <img src='http://www.asmallchange.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christo</title>
		<link>http://www.asmallchange.net/grassroots/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Christo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmallchange.net/?p=8#comment-47</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m excited about your blog, Jason. I&#039;ll definitely be a subscriber.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m excited about your blog, Jason. I&#8217;ll definitely be a subscriber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

